Do you really think that putting up 17 articles at once will generate good peer review on each of them? Especially with multiple articles on similar subject matter, there is a limited number of interested reviewers, and this is overwhelming! I would suggest picking two or three (at most) that are closest to being ready for an FAC nomination, and removing the others. The Peer Review system (and FAC, for that matter) is not robust enough to handle such heavy volume of this nature. -
Bantman00:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)reply
True, but you are expected to incorporate suggestions at a reasonable rate and inactive requests are archived. I don't think you can give all reviews the attention they deserve if you've got this much requests going at the same time. -
Mgm|
(talk)08:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Do you really think that putting up 17 articles at once will generate good peer review on each of them? Especially with multiple articles on similar subject matter, there is a limited number of interested reviewers, and this is overwhelming! I would suggest picking two or three (at most) that are closest to being ready for an FAC nomination, and removing the others. The Peer Review system (and FAC, for that matter) is not robust enough to handle such heavy volume of this nature. -
Bantman00:40, 21 September 2005 (UTC)reply
True, but you are expected to incorporate suggestions at a reasonable rate and inactive requests are archived. I don't think you can give all reviews the attention they deserve if you've got this much requests going at the same time. -
Mgm|
(talk)08:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC)reply