This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm getting this article ready for an FAC, and as a result, I would highly appreciate a peer review to iron out the kinks. A copy edit has been requested as well, but I anticipate it to be complete before the PRand has been completed. Anyhow, thanks in advance, and I'll take any advice I can get! EricLeb01 (
Page |
Talk) 00:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)reply
References
When short-citing, please divide in General and Specific content, makes it easier to see where the repetitive references are from.
Done. I'm also going to add anchor links to the footnotes in a few.
Lead
The lead should not have any references in them. If anything is not references later it should then be repeated in main.
This has been under debate.
WP:LEADCITE gives (what I find to be) a vague explanation to proceed, and there have been recent discussions (
[1],
[2]) on reforming the current rules. I do not want to remove everything I've done if it is later decided to be a bad move, so I'll take it to FAC with citations; unless I'm misunderstanding the concept of the guideline.
tributaries, wl
I'm not familiar with PR lingo, but I assume it meant wiki-link. Done.
% -> percent
Eliminated a few instances, left for numerals > 10.
Lists
Why do we need to know where all the crossings are? Seems irrelevant.
Seems good. By the way it is considered rude to strike the reviewers comments, I do not mind but don't do it at the FAC :)
Sandman888 (
talk) Latest PR 06:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Oh, I never really thought it would be considered rude. Thanks, and thanks for the review! EricLeb01 (
Page |
Talk) 15:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)reply
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm getting this article ready for an FAC, and as a result, I would highly appreciate a peer review to iron out the kinks. A copy edit has been requested as well, but I anticipate it to be complete before the PRand has been completed. Anyhow, thanks in advance, and I'll take any advice I can get! EricLeb01 (
Page |
Talk) 00:49, 16 August 2010 (UTC)reply
References
When short-citing, please divide in General and Specific content, makes it easier to see where the repetitive references are from.
Done. I'm also going to add anchor links to the footnotes in a few.
Lead
The lead should not have any references in them. If anything is not references later it should then be repeated in main.
This has been under debate.
WP:LEADCITE gives (what I find to be) a vague explanation to proceed, and there have been recent discussions (
[1],
[2]) on reforming the current rules. I do not want to remove everything I've done if it is later decided to be a bad move, so I'll take it to FAC with citations; unless I'm misunderstanding the concept of the guideline.
tributaries, wl
I'm not familiar with PR lingo, but I assume it meant wiki-link. Done.
% -> percent
Eliminated a few instances, left for numerals > 10.
Lists
Why do we need to know where all the crossings are? Seems irrelevant.
Seems good. By the way it is considered rude to strike the reviewers comments, I do not mind but don't do it at the FAC :)
Sandman888 (
talk) Latest PR 06:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Oh, I never really thought it would be considered rude. Thanks, and thanks for the review! EricLeb01 (
Page |
Talk) 15:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)reply