See if possible if there is a
free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
Watch for
redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
redundancy exercises.)
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
Avoid using contractions like: didn't, didn't, didn't, didn't, wouldn't.
As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
I have fixed the article so that it satisfies the automated reviews, but some human input would be much more useful I think.--
Macca7174 17:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm going to remove this from peer review now. I don't know how to archive the suggestions, but I will save them in
Talk:Peter Canavan, and get a more experienced user to do this properly.--
Macca7174 20:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply
See if possible if there is a
free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
Watch for
redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
redundancy exercises.)
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
Avoid using contractions like: didn't, didn't, didn't, didn't, wouldn't.
As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
I have fixed the article so that it satisfies the automated reviews, but some human input would be much more useful I think.--
Macca7174 17:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)reply
I'm going to remove this from peer review now. I don't know how to archive the suggestions, but I will save them in
Talk:Peter Canavan, and get a more experienced user to do this properly.--
Macca7174 20:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)reply