This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because Ive made large changes and contributions. I would like to know how I can improve the article.
Thanks, Lourie Pieterse ( talk) 10:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments:
The article looks to be in a fairly early stage of development, and quite a lot of work is necessary to bring it up to a good standard. Here are some areas that you should concentrate on:-
Don't be downhearted by the seeming negative tone of these comments. There is plenty of good and useful information here, it just needs to be organized in a better way. I hope my remarks will help you to do this. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because Ive made large changes and contributions. I would like to know how I can improve the article.
Thanks, Lourie Pieterse ( talk) 10:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments:
The article looks to be in a fairly early stage of development, and quite a lot of work is necessary to bring it up to a good standard. Here are some areas that you should concentrate on:-
Don't be downhearted by the seeming negative tone of these comments. There is plenty of good and useful information here, it just needs to be organized in a better way. I hope my remarks will help you to do this. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)