I have been reading, and following the article for a few months, and in my opinion it is very well executed and capable of being a Good Article. I would like to ask all intrested editors to give their opinion of the article. Myrockstar 23:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Andy t 15:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've been quite involved in editing the article recently, and still see some large issues. I'd like to see all the in-line citations changed to the <ref> system; many claims still need sources, and I've marked some with {{ fact}}; some of the article's content belongs on articles for her various ventures (eg. controversies like James Frey on the Oprah Winfrey Show article); and other sections should be re-written ("Media counterculture", "Fan base"). Hope this helps. Harr o 5 22:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd say there are too many "fair use" images. Having one image at the top to identify her is fine, the other seven are unnecessary and should be removed. User:Angr 11:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
I have been reading, and following the article for a few months, and in my opinion it is very well executed and capable of being a Good Article. I would like to ask all intrested editors to give their opinion of the article. Myrockstar 23:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Andy t 15:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've been quite involved in editing the article recently, and still see some large issues. I'd like to see all the in-line citations changed to the <ref> system; many claims still need sources, and I've marked some with {{ fact}}; some of the article's content belongs on articles for her various ventures (eg. controversies like James Frey on the Oprah Winfrey Show article); and other sections should be re-written ("Media counterculture", "Fan base"). Hope this helps. Harr o 5 22:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'd say there are too many "fair use" images. Having one image at the top to identify her is fine, the other seven are unnecessary and should be removed. User:Angr 11:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)