This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am unsure weather or not the article will stand up the scrutiny of a FA review.
The article has just been passed its A-Class review, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Brevity, however grammar was brought up as one of the issues which may temporally delay the article from being upgraded to FA.
I have gone through the article having a mess around sorting out mistakes I have spotted however it would be great if another pair of eyes or two could scan the article and sort out any remaining grammatical screw ups.
Thanks, EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 11:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
If you'd like me to have a detailed look through I might be persuaded to! MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk) 18:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am unsure weather or not the article will stand up the scrutiny of a FA review.
The article has just been passed its A-Class review, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Brevity, however grammar was brought up as one of the issues which may temporally delay the article from being upgraded to FA.
I have gone through the article having a mess around sorting out mistakes I have spotted however it would be great if another pair of eyes or two could scan the article and sort out any remaining grammatical screw ups.
Thanks, EnigmaMcmxc ( talk) 11:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
If you'd like me to have a detailed look through I might be persuaded to! MasterOfHisOwnDomain ( talk) 18:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)