Nintendo

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's almost to good article in my opinion, but there are a few minor problems in the article that I would like to get an opinion on.

Thanks, Nathan2055 ^talk 14:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC) reply

It's nowhere near in becoming a good article:

• "New ventures" subsection has paragraphs with no citations
• "Electronic era" subsection has a paragraph with no citations
• "Handheld console history" subsection has a paragraph with no citations
• there's a {citation needed} template in the "Offices and locations", "Emulation", and "License guidelines" subsections
• the "Emulation" subsection has a template identifying issues where:
  • It needs additional citations for verification.
  • It may contain original research.
  • It may contain previously unpublished synthesis of published material that conveys ideas not attributable to the original sources.
• There are also many one-sentence paragraphs throughout the article that should be merged with the previous or next paragraph.

So there's a lot of work needed to be done- SCB '92 ( talk) 16:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC) reply