This peer review discussion has been closed.
I recently got this article to GA status. I asked an FA regular to take a quick peek to see if he'd recommend taking this to peer review before attempting to get it to FA status and he answered affirmatively. I'd be very grateful for input of any kind. Thanks! :)
Cameron
*
14:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Bot's comments
Eustress' comments
Here are some suggestions and things to fix:
Overall, a nice-looking, well-sourced article. Best wishes -- Eustress ( talk) 03:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I recently got this article to GA status. I asked an FA regular to take a quick peek to see if he'd recommend taking this to peer review before attempting to get it to FA status and he answered affirmatively. I'd be very grateful for input of any kind. Thanks! :)
Cameron
*
14:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Bot's comments
Eustress' comments
Here are some suggestions and things to fix:
Overall, a nice-looking, well-sourced article. Best wishes -- Eustress ( talk) 03:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)