Previous peer review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
The previous peer review for this page only received comments for the first half of this article, and so I have re-listed the page because I will require a full and thorough review of this article before I make the submission for GAN and eventually go for FAN. I am happy to receive comments that might help the process become less difficult and which would be very much appreciated and helpful.

Thanks, Z105space ( Talk to me!) 11:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC) reply