This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article was and is inches from FA, and then I was told Peer Review was back from the dead and I should utilize it. :) So, what separates this from FA? I have the feeling its related to prose and copyediting, so help me hack away, because that's not my strong point.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 16:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This article is pretty good. It's definitely at GA, but it does need an amount of work to get up to FA. Here are some of the problems I found, but I might have missed some. Have you asked User:Igordebraga to look at this?
bibliomaniac 15 Hey you! Stop lazing around and help fix this article instead! 02:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow, I became a highly regarded editor. (and this request came while I am thinking on how to improve two articles of Metroid) The article is very detailed, so it's hard to look at all the text. Besides what Bibliomaniac said (specially the second and fourth items), so far I could only think of:
If I think of anything else, I drop a word. igordebraga ≠ 03:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
I just looked at sources, and reviewed like I would have for an FAC. (April 13, 2008)
I finally have some time to review this article. I'll give it a more thorough reading later, but the issues that stand out to me are:
Hope that helps some, I'll do a more in-depth review either tonight or tomorrow. ( Guyinblack25 talk 20:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC))
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article was and is inches from FA, and then I was told Peer Review was back from the dead and I should utilize it. :) So, what separates this from FA? I have the feeling its related to prose and copyediting, so help me hack away, because that's not my strong point.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 16:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This article is pretty good. It's definitely at GA, but it does need an amount of work to get up to FA. Here are some of the problems I found, but I might have missed some. Have you asked User:Igordebraga to look at this?
bibliomaniac 15 Hey you! Stop lazing around and help fix this article instead! 02:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow, I became a highly regarded editor. (and this request came while I am thinking on how to improve two articles of Metroid) The article is very detailed, so it's hard to look at all the text. Besides what Bibliomaniac said (specially the second and fourth items), so far I could only think of:
If I think of anything else, I drop a word. igordebraga ≠ 03:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
I just looked at sources, and reviewed like I would have for an FAC. (April 13, 2008)
I finally have some time to review this article. I'll give it a more thorough reading later, but the issues that stand out to me are:
Hope that helps some, I'll do a more in-depth review either tonight or tomorrow. ( Guyinblack25 talk 20:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC))