- A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is too short to become featured but I'd still like to receive feedback on how to improve it. Thanks!
Gary King (
talk)
16:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Beautifully done, might be expandable per my comments at Manitoba and Alberta. Very good formatting, illustration, layout, and citation. I'm thinking in terms of utility: if a reader were considering studying or working at one of these places, what would be the basic information they'd want to know? Durova Charge! 06:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Alright thanks, I will look around a bit. I've also copyedited the lead a bit further. Gary King ( talk) 06:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
"and they are all governed"I'm a bit concerned about your use of a tertiary source http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=AboutThisSite&Params=A1 to reference another tertiary source.Spell out lesser-known abbreviations in the citations."is the only university in the province to not offer graduate-level programs."-->is the only university in the province that does not offer graduate-level programs."University student enrollment" Who else would be enrolled at a university?Dabomb87 ( talk) 12:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King ( talk) 16:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Spell out abbreviations in the references.
- Otherwise, sources look good.
– Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King ( talk) 16:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - same thing as I said in the others, spell out the key and expand the lead. S R X 20:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is too short to become featured but I'd still like to receive feedback on how to improve it. Thanks!
Gary King (
talk)
16:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Beautifully done, might be expandable per my comments at Manitoba and Alberta. Very good formatting, illustration, layout, and citation. I'm thinking in terms of utility: if a reader were considering studying or working at one of these places, what would be the basic information they'd want to know? Durova Charge! 06:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Alright thanks, I will look around a bit. I've also copyedited the lead a bit further. Gary King ( talk) 06:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs)
"and they are all governed"I'm a bit concerned about your use of a tertiary source http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/index.cfm?PgNm=AboutThisSite&Params=A1 to reference another tertiary source.Spell out lesser-known abbreviations in the citations."is the only university in the province to not offer graduate-level programs."-->is the only university in the province that does not offer graduate-level programs."University student enrollment" Who else would be enrolled at a university?Dabomb87 ( talk) 12:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King ( talk) 16:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Spell out abbreviations in the references.
- Otherwise, sources look good.
– Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King ( talk) 16:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - same thing as I said in the others, spell out the key and expand the lead. S R X 20:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)