From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Toronto Blue Jays managers

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because The Rambling Man suggested it.

Thanks, -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 20:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

KV5 comments

OK, so Maclean says that he has a source for Harry Warner's managing 12 games. That we can use, and if I can see the source, I will make a stub for him as well so that the list is not incomplete. The last thing I think we need to do in terms of the actual list is find out why Cookie Rojas managed three games in 2001.

On a personal note, I'd like to thank the author for being patient with us as reviewers. I know from experience what a grueling process FLC can be; it's one of the reasons I don't even begin to touch FAs. I think that if Maclean, K. Annoyomous24, myself, and other reviewers work together, we can finish this up and get this list to FL. I would suggest that since it's been through two failed noms in two weeks, we should wait about a month and make sure it's perfectly clean and shipshape before putting forth another nomination. If all goes as planned, I'll gladly come on as a co-nom, if it meets our standards. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 21:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

This source will corroborate the Blue Jays' official website for Cookie Rojas. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 22:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply
If you enable your WP email (see user preferences) I can email you some news articles on Warner. I still haven't found anything about Rojas' stint yet. -- maclean 00:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the sources for Cookie Rojas, Killervogel15. You can e-mial me those articles now, maclean. I would greatly appreciate it. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 00:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I am guessing Rojas coached May 25-27, 2001 games against the Red Sox. Why? Because on May 25, 2001, "manager Buck Martinez has taken a leave from the team for 3 games to attend his mother-in-law's funeral." per JAYS UPDATES.-- Crzy cheetah 07:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes, that is confirmed by the Globe and Mail: May 25, May 28. maclean 19:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

maclean25 comments

I merged a more detailed introduction from my sandbox into the article. [1] Is this ok? -- maclean 01:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

sure...looks long but sure... -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 01:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
By the way, should I erase 10 games from Hartsfield, make Warners, and put it on Warners or what? -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 01:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Good question. Which is a more reliable source: Baseball-Reference.com or toronto.bluejays.mlb.com? B-R.com has been accepted in previous FLs as reliable, but of the 14 managers the two sources differ on 8 of them. -- maclean 02:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I personally still don't accept all of these sports-reference.com sites. I always find too many errors when I research football or basketball-related lists. Now, I see they have errors on baseball, as well, but I am not surprised anymore. I strongly recommend not to use this site as a source and go with some alternative sources. The lead looks awesome, by the way.-- Crzy cheetah 03:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Here's the problem: Baseball Reference was thought of as the "alternative" source to official team histories. Over-reliance on official websites is a big no-no over at WP:FA, so where are we to go? Baseball-Cube, Baseball-Reference, Baseball America, Baseball Almanac... there are a lot of sites out there but to be honest, it's hard to know which ones agree. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 03:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I just made a thread on the talk page to decide whether or not to use baseball-reference.com. Please eeply if you want to withdraw or not withdraw the reference. Thanks! -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 03:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Actually, the current lead can be in the new section titled history of managers or something similar and the old lead be brought back. It's really quite long for a lead, it's even longer than the table. The information is useful and nicely written, but I don't think it should be in the lead.-- Crzy cheetah 07:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
So what should I do? I prefer my intro better but I don't know about KV5. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 07:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Let's wait for maclean, since he's the one who wrote the current lead.-- Crzy cheetah 07:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Sure. Do what you think is best. It is meant to provide meaning (or the story) to the list. Though I'd shy away from some of the more off-topic points in the original, like explaining the Expos, to keep it focused on Blue Jay Managers. -- maclean 19:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
K.Annoy, could you create the new section and bring back the revious version of the lead? Then we can probably figure out what is needed and what's not.-- Crzy cheetah 02:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
What section should I make? -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 02:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The Overview or History section where most of the info from the current lead can go.-- Crzy cheetah 02:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Which article should I put it on? If you want me to put it on the Toronto Blue Jays article, I can't because I would mess up their format. Also, I revived the original lead with the first paragraph. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 02:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Hey guys, I'm back. K.Annoy, I think what he is saying is to make a section after the lead but before the list which is a history or an overview in addition to the lead (a la List of Major League Baseball players from Puerto Rico). KV5Squawk boxFight on!
Crzycheetah already did. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 18:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Toronto Blue Jays managers

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because The Rambling Man suggested it.

Thanks, -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 20:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

KV5 comments

OK, so Maclean says that he has a source for Harry Warner's managing 12 games. That we can use, and if I can see the source, I will make a stub for him as well so that the list is not incomplete. The last thing I think we need to do in terms of the actual list is find out why Cookie Rojas managed three games in 2001.

On a personal note, I'd like to thank the author for being patient with us as reviewers. I know from experience what a grueling process FLC can be; it's one of the reasons I don't even begin to touch FAs. I think that if Maclean, K. Annoyomous24, myself, and other reviewers work together, we can finish this up and get this list to FL. I would suggest that since it's been through two failed noms in two weeks, we should wait about a month and make sure it's perfectly clean and shipshape before putting forth another nomination. If all goes as planned, I'll gladly come on as a co-nom, if it meets our standards. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 21:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

This source will corroborate the Blue Jays' official website for Cookie Rojas. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 22:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply
If you enable your WP email (see user preferences) I can email you some news articles on Warner. I still haven't found anything about Rojas' stint yet. -- maclean 00:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Thanks for the sources for Cookie Rojas, Killervogel15. You can e-mial me those articles now, maclean. I would greatly appreciate it. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 00:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I am guessing Rojas coached May 25-27, 2001 games against the Red Sox. Why? Because on May 25, 2001, "manager Buck Martinez has taken a leave from the team for 3 games to attend his mother-in-law's funeral." per JAYS UPDATES.-- Crzy cheetah 07:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Yes, that is confirmed by the Globe and Mail: May 25, May 28. maclean 19:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

maclean25 comments

I merged a more detailed introduction from my sandbox into the article. [1] Is this ok? -- maclean 01:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

sure...looks long but sure... -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 01:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
By the way, should I erase 10 games from Hartsfield, make Warners, and put it on Warners or what? -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 01:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Good question. Which is a more reliable source: Baseball-Reference.com or toronto.bluejays.mlb.com? B-R.com has been accepted in previous FLs as reliable, but of the 14 managers the two sources differ on 8 of them. -- maclean 02:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I personally still don't accept all of these sports-reference.com sites. I always find too many errors when I research football or basketball-related lists. Now, I see they have errors on baseball, as well, but I am not surprised anymore. I strongly recommend not to use this site as a source and go with some alternative sources. The lead looks awesome, by the way.-- Crzy cheetah 03:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Here's the problem: Baseball Reference was thought of as the "alternative" source to official team histories. Over-reliance on official websites is a big no-no over at WP:FA, so where are we to go? Baseball-Cube, Baseball-Reference, Baseball America, Baseball Almanac... there are a lot of sites out there but to be honest, it's hard to know which ones agree. KV5Squawk boxFight on! 03:40, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I just made a thread on the talk page to decide whether or not to use baseball-reference.com. Please eeply if you want to withdraw or not withdraw the reference. Thanks! -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 03:48, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Actually, the current lead can be in the new section titled history of managers or something similar and the old lead be brought back. It's really quite long for a lead, it's even longer than the table. The information is useful and nicely written, but I don't think it should be in the lead.-- Crzy cheetah 07:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
So what should I do? I prefer my intro better but I don't know about KV5. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 07:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Let's wait for maclean, since he's the one who wrote the current lead.-- Crzy cheetah 07:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Sure. Do what you think is best. It is meant to provide meaning (or the story) to the list. Though I'd shy away from some of the more off-topic points in the original, like explaining the Expos, to keep it focused on Blue Jay Managers. -- maclean 19:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply
K.Annoy, could you create the new section and bring back the revious version of the lead? Then we can probably figure out what is needed and what's not.-- Crzy cheetah 02:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
What section should I make? -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 02:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
The Overview or History section where most of the info from the current lead can go.-- Crzy cheetah 02:31, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Which article should I put it on? If you want me to put it on the Toronto Blue Jays article, I can't because I would mess up their format. Also, I revived the original lead with the first paragraph. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 02:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply
Hey guys, I'm back. K.Annoy, I think what he is saying is to make a section after the lead but before the list which is a history or an overview in addition to the lead (a la List of Major League Baseball players from Puerto Rico). KV5Squawk boxFight on!
Crzycheetah already did. -- K. Annoyomous 24 GO LAKERS! 18:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook