This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to achieve Featured Topic status for the
Nashville Sounds topic some day. As this list is too short to become a featured list (it was nominated and failed), it needs to be peer reviewed. I believe it is well-written and could become a featured list, but is only held back by its size.
Thanks, NatureBoyMD ( talk) 04:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments
There's not a lot to review here. The shortness of the list seems to be the main stumbling block to its becoming featured. Other than waiting for the Sounds to achieve a few more no-hitter games, the most practical way to getting it featured, or at any rate to GA, would be to re-write it as an article, with prose descriptions of the games replacing the list.
On the intro as it stands at the moment:-
Final point: what is (7) doing in the table?
I hope these points help you to decide the article/list's future. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Kaldari comments
Other than that, I can't see anything else that needs improvement. Kaldari ( talk) 18:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to achieve Featured Topic status for the
Nashville Sounds topic some day. As this list is too short to become a featured list (it was nominated and failed), it needs to be peer reviewed. I believe it is well-written and could become a featured list, but is only held back by its size.
Thanks, NatureBoyMD ( talk) 04:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments
There's not a lot to review here. The shortness of the list seems to be the main stumbling block to its becoming featured. Other than waiting for the Sounds to achieve a few more no-hitter games, the most practical way to getting it featured, or at any rate to GA, would be to re-write it as an article, with prose descriptions of the games replacing the list.
On the intro as it stands at the moment:-
Final point: what is (7) doing in the table?
I hope these points help you to decide the article/list's future. Brianboulton ( talk) 17:47, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Kaldari comments
Other than that, I can't see anything else that needs improvement. Kaldari ( talk) 18:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)