| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I intend to take it to
FAC sometime soon. Thanks,
Plant's Strider (
talk)
13:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'll give this article a look-over as soon as I can, which may not be until Saturday. WesleyDodds ( talk) 09:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to help get this to FA-level too. I will give more detailed comments later, for now the main issues I see from a glance are the lead (too much importance to recent events, esp that O2 concert), "2000s and beyond" (coverage of the 02 concert can be tighter) and "Legacy" (starts off as a dull list of band-names, and ends with a list of minor fashion-trends).— indopug ( talk) 13:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I intend to take it to
FAC sometime soon. Thanks,
Plant's Strider (
talk)
13:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'll give this article a look-over as soon as I can, which may not be until Saturday. WesleyDodds ( talk) 09:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to help get this to FA-level too. I will give more detailed comments later, for now the main issues I see from a glance are the lead (too much importance to recent events, esp that O2 concert), "2000s and beyond" (coverage of the 02 concert can be tighter) and "Legacy" (starts off as a dull list of band-names, and ends with a list of minor fashion-trends).— indopug ( talk) 13:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)