This peer review discussion has been closed.
The article is quite short, but its pretty uses the entire literature on the internet about it and most printed materials too. What can I do to improve it, to even get it considered for GA (as it would probably be quickly rejected due to length)?
ALTON
.ıl
07:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments from User:MeegsC Some things you might consider including:
This peer review discussion has been closed.
The article is quite short, but its pretty uses the entire literature on the internet about it and most printed materials too. What can I do to improve it, to even get it considered for GA (as it would probably be quickly rejected due to length)?
ALTON
.ıl
07:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Comments from User:MeegsC Some things you might consider including: