A script has been used to generate a semi-
automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
house style; it can be found on the
automated peer review page for June 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article has been a
WP:GA for a while now, listing it here to get some feedback on how it can be improved further. Cirt (
talk)
06:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Many references to breeders' sites and general pet sites. Some seems authoritative but I doubt most meet the WP:RS standard.
The lead is too short.
Appearance: Should start with a broad description of the dog, and then mention breed standards and differences between standards and field/show lines. Right now, the article only states what they should look like and the differences between field and show lines, but don't actually describe the breed in general.
A script has been used to generate a semi-
automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and
house style; it can be found on the
automated peer review page for June 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article has been a
WP:GA for a while now, listing it here to get some feedback on how it can be improved further. Cirt (
talk)
06:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Many references to breeders' sites and general pet sites. Some seems authoritative but I doubt most meet the WP:RS standard.
The lead is too short.
Appearance: Should start with a broad description of the dog, and then mention breed standards and differences between standards and field/show lines. Right now, the article only states what they should look like and the differences between field and show lines, but don't actually describe the breed in general.