Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
Like its forerunner The Heart of Thomas (which I previously brought to FA after a very helpful peer review), Kaze to Ki no Uta is one of the most influential manga works of the 1970s, contributing significantly to the development of Japanese girls comics. I recently expanded this article significantly and brought it up to GA status, so I wanted to test the waters at peer review in advance of potentially bringing it to FAC.
Thanks, Morgan695 ( talk) 06:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Addressed comments
|
---|
|
I have decided to carve out some time to help with this. A majority of my comments are up to the "Development" section, except for one which is later on. I hope that these comments are helpful and inspire other editors to look through the article. Once my comments are addressed, would you prefer that I collapse them or move them to the talk page? I only ask because I believe the collapse template is no longer permitted on the FAC page and I want to know your preference in general. Aoba47 ( talk) 03:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
These are some things I noticed in the remainder of the article, but I will do a more thorough reading next week. I hope these comments are helpful and let me know if you have any questions. Aoba47 ( talk) 02:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion is closed. |
Like its forerunner The Heart of Thomas (which I previously brought to FA after a very helpful peer review), Kaze to Ki no Uta is one of the most influential manga works of the 1970s, contributing significantly to the development of Japanese girls comics. I recently expanded this article significantly and brought it up to GA status, so I wanted to test the waters at peer review in advance of potentially bringing it to FAC.
Thanks, Morgan695 ( talk) 06:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Addressed comments
|
---|
|
I have decided to carve out some time to help with this. A majority of my comments are up to the "Development" section, except for one which is later on. I hope that these comments are helpful and inspire other editors to look through the article. Once my comments are addressed, would you prefer that I collapse them or move them to the talk page? I only ask because I believe the collapse template is no longer permitted on the FAC page and I want to know your preference in general. Aoba47 ( talk) 03:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
These are some things I noticed in the remainder of the article, but I will do a more thorough reading next week. I hope these comments are helpful and let me know if you have any questions. Aoba47 ( talk) 02:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)