This peer review discussion has been closed.
I would like to get this article peer reviewed in order to prepare it for a future FA nomination. Any and all comments are welcome. I am concerned about the "series chronology" and "differences between media" sections for possibly have
OR issues. I am aware that a general copyedit is needed. Thanks,
十
八
11:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
FA? Well, lets see. You said yourself, that it fails #1a. If it meets #1b is something you, as the main contributor(?), can best answer yourself. Criteria #2a, #2b, #2c, #3, and #4 appear to be met. #1d and #1e don't seem to be an issue either, but I didn't look too deeply into these two. Where I am in doubt is #1c. What makes to following sources reliable?
Then there is this sentence: "The subtitle, "Girl Meets Girl", comes from the traditional English phrase "boy meets girl",[3] and is slightly altered to reflect the nature of the same-sex relationships that appear in the series." With [3] being: "Phrase Thesaurus: Women". World English. Retrieved 2008-12-06. - The reference seems reliable, but is only useful to cite the existence of the phrase: "boy meets girl", but not that the title is based on it. -- Goodraise ( talk) 23:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
-- 十 八 01:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I would like to get this article peer reviewed in order to prepare it for a future FA nomination. Any and all comments are welcome. I am concerned about the "series chronology" and "differences between media" sections for possibly have
OR issues. I am aware that a general copyedit is needed. Thanks,
十
八
11:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
FA? Well, lets see. You said yourself, that it fails #1a. If it meets #1b is something you, as the main contributor(?), can best answer yourself. Criteria #2a, #2b, #2c, #3, and #4 appear to be met. #1d and #1e don't seem to be an issue either, but I didn't look too deeply into these two. Where I am in doubt is #1c. What makes to following sources reliable?
Then there is this sentence: "The subtitle, "Girl Meets Girl", comes from the traditional English phrase "boy meets girl",[3] and is slightly altered to reflect the nature of the same-sex relationships that appear in the series." With [3] being: "Phrase Thesaurus: Women". World English. Retrieved 2008-12-06. - The reference seems reliable, but is only useful to cite the existence of the phrase: "boy meets girl", but not that the title is based on it. -- Goodraise ( talk) 23:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
-- 十 八 01:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)