Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I made some substantial additions to the article today after doing considerable research and having a friend edit the article for readability. I believe it is now of higher quality than the C Class it was last assigned. If it is not yet worthy of Feature Article status, I would like to hear what changes are needed to get there. The history of John Neal is very dear to me.

Thanks so much for your help! — Dugan Murphy ( talk) 02:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC) reply

This is great! And a really entertaining article. What a character! I can safely say this is likely to sail past a GA review and suggest you iron out things like citation style, phrasing etc. at a featured article review. I can't see any major problems with writing style, images, citations, content or broadness - other than to say I feel it's written in a very readable but neutral manner with some fantastic images backing it up. Good luck!

This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!