Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because there have been some general fixes in the past few days. I want to know what else people think needs done before I eventually nominate it for GA.

Thanks, Go Phightins! ( talk) 02:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC) reply

I see you got no PRs for the article. This is likely because the article is not even at GA level yet (check WP:Peer review, which points out PR is typically for articles going to FA). Zepppep ( talk) 06:06, 19 October 2012 (UTC) reply