This peer review discussion has been closed.
Once featured, now only B-class. No review since open sourcing of Java (2007). General review needed.
Thanks, Kozuch ( talk) 21:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: I agree this is not FA or even GA in its current state. It is an interesting article and while it is clear that a lot of work has been put into it, much more is needed to improve it further. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
Once featured, now only B-class. No review since open sourcing of Java (2007). General review needed.
Thanks, Kozuch ( talk) 21:48, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: I agree this is not FA or even GA in its current state. It is an interesting article and while it is clear that a lot of work has been put into it, much more is needed to improve it further. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)