Jackalope
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it occurred to me that it would be a very fun and amusing TFA some day on April Fool's day or a similar event, and wondered if there would be the remotest possibility that it could be brought up to Featured Article status. I've been involved with about 12 TFA articles so far, and so I know the how to get something there, but my question for peer reviewers is if you think this topic would be doomed from the outset (I will note that
Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo has been a TfA, so I don't think I am lowering the standards here). I know it's nowhere close now, but I'm curious if anyone thinks it's worth the trouble to try. In short, is it possible to find enough reliable sources to expand and verify this article to a FAC-passable standard? My preliminary check give me
this and
this. Thoughts? Comments? Volunteers?
Thanks, Montanabw (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Finetooth comments
Yes. I think it's worth the trouble to try, and I would enjoy working on this. Finetooth ( talk) 19:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- On further review, maybe not. I found some stuff, but most is fluff. Enough, enough! It might be possible to compile a section of folklore analysis, a sort of critical review of the jackalope, based on scholarly publications. Jackalope as griffin parody? Jackalope as tourist lure. (See biggest ball of twine.) There's a jackalope in Dubois, Wyoming, that's rideable, according to unreliable sources. Jackalope as mechanical bull? Finetooth ( talk) 00:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Jackalope
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it occurred to me that it would be a very fun and amusing TFA some day on April Fool's day or a similar event, and wondered if there would be the remotest possibility that it could be brought up to Featured Article status. I've been involved with about 12 TFA articles so far, and so I know the how to get something there, but my question for peer reviewers is if you think this topic would be doomed from the outset (I will note that
Mr. Hankey, the Christmas Poo has been a TfA, so I don't think I am lowering the standards here). I know it's nowhere close now, but I'm curious if anyone thinks it's worth the trouble to try. In short, is it possible to find enough reliable sources to expand and verify this article to a FAC-passable standard? My preliminary check give me
this and
this. Thoughts? Comments? Volunteers?
Thanks, Montanabw (talk) 03:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Finetooth comments
Yes. I think it's worth the trouble to try, and I would enjoy working on this. Finetooth ( talk) 19:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- On further review, maybe not. I found some stuff, but most is fluff. Enough, enough! It might be possible to compile a section of folklore analysis, a sort of critical review of the jackalope, based on scholarly publications. Jackalope as griffin parody? Jackalope as tourist lure. (See biggest ball of twine.) There's a jackalope in Dubois, Wyoming, that's rideable, according to unreliable sources. Jackalope as mechanical bull? Finetooth ( talk) 00:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)