Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's my first article on Wikipedia. I'm looking for general feedback/assessment. I've completely rewritten the article to add detail and depth, improve structure, improve style, increase the impartiality of the section on Szabó’s informant activities, add and improve references, add images, and reformat and expand the filmography. How would you rate it? What would it need to atttain Featured Article status?
Thanks,
Hirschjoshua (
talk)
04:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: This looks very creditable for a first article. I have not had time to look closely at the prose, but I have identified some issues that require attention if the article is to move towards Good Article standard. I would not advise you to think in Featured Article terms just yet (the FA criteria are very demanding), though this can clearly be a target for the future:-
My advice is that you should attend to these issues initially. When you have done so I will be happy to look at the prose if you contact my talkpage. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Brian! I appreciate your time, and will attend to your suggestions. Hirschjoshua ( talk) 04:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it's my first article on Wikipedia. I'm looking for general feedback/assessment. I've completely rewritten the article to add detail and depth, improve structure, improve style, increase the impartiality of the section on Szabó’s informant activities, add and improve references, add images, and reformat and expand the filmography. How would you rate it? What would it need to atttain Featured Article status?
Thanks,
Hirschjoshua (
talk)
04:48, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: This looks very creditable for a first article. I have not had time to look closely at the prose, but I have identified some issues that require attention if the article is to move towards Good Article standard. I would not advise you to think in Featured Article terms just yet (the FA criteria are very demanding), though this can clearly be a target for the future:-
My advice is that you should attend to these issues initially. When you have done so I will be happy to look at the prose if you contact my talkpage. Brianboulton ( talk) 16:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you Brian! I appreciate your time, and will attend to your suggestions. Hirschjoshua ( talk) 04:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)