Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has recently been passed for GA status and gotten copyedited. I would like to get it up for WP:FAC in a little bit and would appreciate any comments for improvements.

Thanks, The Flash ^{talk} 04:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)

• You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
• What makes the following reliable sources?
  • http://www.comicbookresources.com/
  • http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=10768
  • http://www.sliceofscifi.com/2008/03/13/the-spectacular-spider-man-premiere-swings-to-strong-nielsen-ratings/
  • http://www.mania.com/crispin-freeman-charges-up-spiderman-electro_article_90758.html

Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 20:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the comments.

Comic Book Resources is a comic book news website.

The Gargoyles thing was confirmed here as being real and reliable.

Slice of SciFi is a sci-fi news website.

Mania.com is an interview and news website frequently used by other RS.

The Flash ^{talk} 23:34, 28 September 2009 (UTC) reply