Review is requested from two sorts of individuals. First, those with expertise in psychodynamic psychotherapies, to make sure I have fairly and accurately used technical terminology. Second, those with a general interest in high quality rhetoric and prose, to make sure I have written well and am neither too prolix, nor too jargon-laden.
I thank all those who take an interest in these matters, and all comments will be carefully considered.
-- Robert Tarzwell 03:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Nice article. Clear description of technique and purposes.
Thanks for your feedback! I have replied in more detail on your talk page. All your suggested edits have been incorporated, and I believe they were right on the money. -- Robert Tarzwell 18:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Review is requested from two sorts of individuals. First, those with expertise in psychodynamic psychotherapies, to make sure I have fairly and accurately used technical terminology. Second, those with a general interest in high quality rhetoric and prose, to make sure I have written well and am neither too prolix, nor too jargon-laden.
I thank all those who take an interest in these matters, and all comments will be carefully considered.
-- Robert Tarzwell 03:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
Nice article. Clear description of technique and purposes.
Thanks for your feedback! I have replied in more detail on your talk page. All your suggested edits have been incorporated, and I believe they were right on the money. -- Robert Tarzwell 18:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)