This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to a GA status and would like some input on it beforehand.
Note to nominator: This is your second nomination for 7 December;
WP:PR rules allow only one per day from a single nominator - please bear that in mind for the future.
Brianboulton (
talk)
00:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Comments
Infobox - "1999–02" should really be "1999–2002".
"The album was also compared to Faith Hill's album, Breathe (1999)." is this relevant in the lead? And what were the results of the comparison?
"certified gold" or "certified Gold"? Be internally consistent.
Why don't "You Are" and "Soon" have articles?
"between the years 1999 and 2001" no need for "the years".
"At the time, during the litigation with her label" not sure you need "At the time" here at all.
"Rimes was asking " Rimes asked.
"The 2001 release of the album" repetitive from previous sentence. Suggest a merge "... Curb Records, and featured..."
"of four minutes and fifty-eight seconds" + "duration".
"a ballad[23] song" don't need "song" here.
"Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " followed by "Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " repetitive.
"that Rimes "comfortably adopting some..." not grammatically correct.
"saying that "The good" no need for that here.
"-- " replace with an en-dash.
"two and a half" usually see this hyphenated.
"did quite well on" reads too colloquially, perhaps "peformed well".
"it fell to" -> "falling to".
"Internationally the album did quite well" ditto as above comment.
"as high as number five" just "at number five" will do.
"Year-end" any need for that Y to be capitalised?
"as well as four other countries" the RIAA isn't a country. Perhaps "as well as in four other contries" or "as well as four other organizations".
Year-end charts table sorts strangely because the 2002 heading moves...
Sales/shipments column doesn't sort correctly.
Don't mix date formats in refs (e.g. ref 30, 34 etc).
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to a GA status and would like some input on it beforehand.
Note to nominator: This is your second nomination for 7 December;
WP:PR rules allow only one per day from a single nominator - please bear that in mind for the future.
Brianboulton (
talk)
00:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)reply
Comments
Infobox - "1999–02" should really be "1999–2002".
"The album was also compared to Faith Hill's album, Breathe (1999)." is this relevant in the lead? And what were the results of the comparison?
"certified gold" or "certified Gold"? Be internally consistent.
Why don't "You Are" and "Soon" have articles?
"between the years 1999 and 2001" no need for "the years".
"At the time, during the litigation with her label" not sure you need "At the time" here at all.
"Rimes was asking " Rimes asked.
"The 2001 release of the album" repetitive from previous sentence. Suggest a merge "... Curb Records, and featured..."
"of four minutes and fifty-eight seconds" + "duration".
"a ballad[23] song" don't need "song" here.
"Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " followed by "Mark Huxley at Barnes & Noble.com praised the " repetitive.
"that Rimes "comfortably adopting some..." not grammatically correct.
"saying that "The good" no need for that here.
"-- " replace with an en-dash.
"two and a half" usually see this hyphenated.
"did quite well on" reads too colloquially, perhaps "peformed well".
"it fell to" -> "falling to".
"Internationally the album did quite well" ditto as above comment.
"as high as number five" just "at number five" will do.
"Year-end" any need for that Y to be capitalised?
"as well as four other countries" the RIAA isn't a country. Perhaps "as well as in four other contries" or "as well as four other organizations".
Year-end charts table sorts strangely because the 2002 heading moves...
Sales/shipments column doesn't sort correctly.
Don't mix date formats in refs (e.g. ref 30, 34 etc).