Overall, this article has improved considerably. Criticism about NPOV continues to come up on the talk page from time to time, but I would like some dispassionate opinions about it overall.
Darentig18:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I had thought about that, but the citations for all these stats are provided with the more in-depth info beneath that the intro is drawn from, so that seemed like overkill. FYI, that statement was recently added to the intro because someone had complained that the article had too much information and they were only looking for the basics. I personally don't see any point in looking at an article that only provides the basics, but I thought such a summation might serve this sort of person better. As I say, that is all documented below.
Darentig16:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)reply
Overall, this article has improved considerably. Criticism about NPOV continues to come up on the talk page from time to time, but I would like some dispassionate opinions about it overall.
Darentig18:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)reply
I had thought about that, but the citations for all these stats are provided with the more in-depth info beneath that the intro is drawn from, so that seemed like overkill. FYI, that statement was recently added to the intro because someone had complained that the article had too much information and they were only looking for the basics. I personally don't see any point in looking at an article that only provides the basics, but I thought such a summation might serve this sort of person better. As I say, that is all documented below.
Darentig16:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)reply