Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it's expanded to the point where I'm thinking about good article status, but the article has been a one-person effort and I'd appreciate thorough review from a third party. I've tried (perhaps unsuccessfully) to avoid burdening the article with railfan jargon.
Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 14:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Always nice to read a page about trains :). I think this article has a good chance of meeting the good article criteria and would benefit from a nomination directly there. Sorry for the long wait, there are only a few of us at PR. -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 06:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it's expanded to the point where I'm thinking about good article status, but the article has been a one-person effort and I'd appreciate thorough review from a third party. I've tried (perhaps unsuccessfully) to avoid burdening the article with railfan jargon.
Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 14:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Always nice to read a page about trains :). I think this article has a good chance of meeting the good article criteria and would benefit from a nomination directly there. Sorry for the long wait, there are only a few of us at PR. -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 06:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)