This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the previous FAC failed. The article needs both a
WP:MOS review and an
WP:NFCC review. I hope to get both in one PR, but realize I may need to open a second dedicated review.
"Because ABC signed him as a rhythm and blues singer he waited until his contract was up for its three-year renewal before experimenting with country music although he wanted to do so sooner." commas, anyone?
"In May, the band played Carnegie Hall back in the United States before returning to California." doesn't sound right?
I am following the source, which does not mention NY until the Copa in the fall. Also, I am not a music person and am not sure if Reno and the Copa still count as part of the tour. The source makes clear the next album was not begun until after the Copa, so I assumed all the bookings were sort of part of his Album tour or at least related to it.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
05:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
no mention of state of New York, where Carnegie Hall is located at, then suddenly mentioning the country of the US then the state of California? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SCB '92 (
talk •
contribs) 12:
05:45, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
"Steagall and Lanier are credited as the writers of this song from their work on its original version in 1967. The song was not a new song." source? and the last sentence is short and out of place
the duet cover on that album earned the 2005 Grammy Award for Record of the Year and Best Pop Collaboration at the 47th Grammy Awards >>> remove either 2005 or at the 47th Grammy Awards
many of its other notable covers have been on country music albums. >>> many of its other notable covers were featured on the track-listings on country music albums.
"Another excellent example of how Ray Charles was able to fuse blues and country, 'Here We Go Again' is a soulful ballad in the Southern blues tradition. Lyrically, it has a resignation and pain that makes the blues, simply, what it is. The recording has a simple and sterling gospel arrangement and, in retrospect, is one of Charles' finer attempts in the studio from the 1960s."
They are separate subjects. The first describes the overall success of all tracks on the album at first. Then, there is a paragraph specific to this song domestically. The third paragraph is for the song on international charts. Maybe the 2nd and 3rd might be merged.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
23:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Hey. Did you give any reconsideration to the LEAD considering what type of public information is available for 44 year old songs and in the face of other FAs of songs of similar age.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
00:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)reply
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the previous FAC failed. The article needs both a
WP:MOS review and an
WP:NFCC review. I hope to get both in one PR, but realize I may need to open a second dedicated review.
"Because ABC signed him as a rhythm and blues singer he waited until his contract was up for its three-year renewal before experimenting with country music although he wanted to do so sooner." commas, anyone?
"In May, the band played Carnegie Hall back in the United States before returning to California." doesn't sound right?
I am following the source, which does not mention NY until the Copa in the fall. Also, I am not a music person and am not sure if Reno and the Copa still count as part of the tour. The source makes clear the next album was not begun until after the Copa, so I assumed all the bookings were sort of part of his Album tour or at least related to it.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
05:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
no mention of state of New York, where Carnegie Hall is located at, then suddenly mentioning the country of the US then the state of California? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SCB '92 (
talk •
contribs) 12:
05:45, 9 September 2011 (UTC)reply
"Steagall and Lanier are credited as the writers of this song from their work on its original version in 1967. The song was not a new song." source? and the last sentence is short and out of place
the duet cover on that album earned the 2005 Grammy Award for Record of the Year and Best Pop Collaboration at the 47th Grammy Awards >>> remove either 2005 or at the 47th Grammy Awards
many of its other notable covers have been on country music albums. >>> many of its other notable covers were featured on the track-listings on country music albums.
"Another excellent example of how Ray Charles was able to fuse blues and country, 'Here We Go Again' is a soulful ballad in the Southern blues tradition. Lyrically, it has a resignation and pain that makes the blues, simply, what it is. The recording has a simple and sterling gospel arrangement and, in retrospect, is one of Charles' finer attempts in the studio from the 1960s."
They are separate subjects. The first describes the overall success of all tracks on the album at first. Then, there is a paragraph specific to this song domestically. The third paragraph is for the song on international charts. Maybe the 2nd and 3rd might be merged.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
23:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Hey. Did you give any reconsideration to the LEAD considering what type of public information is available for 44 year old songs and in the face of other FAs of songs of similar age.--
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
00:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)reply