Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'd like this article to be reviewed because I think it's well-referenced and well-written and am looking for any ways to improve it before I send it to WP:FAC. Thanks, Fbv 65 e del — t — c // 02:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC) reply

• A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR  _t 15:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC) reply

• Lose the cast section it's redundent. Buc ( talk) 13:07, 17 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Please close the peer review: articles shouldn't be simultaneously listed at WP:FAC and WP:PR. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC) reply