Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because of
this, two oppose for an external issue and for not add
my self-thoughts. Also, was pretty clear that prose was a problem. Any comment is welcome.
Tbh®tch
Talk
© Happy Holidays
05:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: I peer-reviewed this article in November, and I find it much improved. However, I'm not sure what fresh ideas I can add. I've read the FAC comments, and it seems that the biggest remaining issues involve the fair-use rationale for the lead image and the depth of the musical analysis. I don't see how a peer review can resolve either of these issues directly. Here, however, are a couple of thoughts.
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because of
this, two oppose for an external issue and for not add
my self-thoughts. Also, was pretty clear that prose was a problem. Any comment is welcome.
Tbh®tch
Talk
© Happy Holidays
05:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: I peer-reviewed this article in November, and I find it much improved. However, I'm not sure what fresh ideas I can add. I've read the FAC comments, and it seems that the biggest remaining issues involve the fair-use rationale for the lead image and the depth of the musical analysis. I don't see how a peer review can resolve either of these issues directly. Here, however, are a couple of thoughts.