Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… it has recently achieved GA status, and I think it has real FA potential. I originally created this article, and have seen it go from strength to strength as @ Changedforbetter: has completely altered and improved it. I added bits and pieces along the way too. I hope we can all work together to create was great article. :)

In particular, source checks, prose copyedits, and image/sound checks are good places to start.

Thanks, Coin945 ( talk) 16:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC) reply