Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I intend to nominate it for FA soon. By the way I am fully aware the 'Themes' section is not detailed enough for FA; i'm currently trying to expand it. Any help in doing so would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Freikorp ( talk) 13:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The themes section has been expanded since I initiated the peer review, though it may still fall short of FA standards. Freikorp ( talk) 04:39, 1 January 2015 (UTC) reply

I'm closing this peer review as it has been open for three weeks without comment. This isn't helping my goal to have it pass FAC, rather it's just wasting time, so i'm just going to nominated it for FAC and wait for comments there. Freikorp ( talk) 06:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC) reply