This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to be able to get it to GA one day, and eventually to FA. I put a lot of work into it, but I understand that there are a lot of sourcing issues in some places. Any suggestions you can provide would be helpful (where to look, any books you know of). Anything else you think this article needs to really help it shine, be bold and speak up.
Thanks, BOZ ( talk) 02:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: This starts off very well done and then its quality goes downhill, here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Scott Free comments:IMAO this is a pretty happenin' article on the FF - here are some things I'd like to see mentioned to make a good article even better:
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to be able to get it to GA one day, and eventually to FA. I put a lot of work into it, but I understand that there are a lot of sourcing issues in some places. Any suggestions you can provide would be helpful (where to look, any books you know of). Anything else you think this article needs to really help it shine, be bold and speak up.
Thanks, BOZ ( talk) 02:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: This starts off very well done and then its quality goes downhill, here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Scott Free comments:IMAO this is a pretty happenin' article on the FF - here are some things I'd like to see mentioned to make a good article even better: