Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

• A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR  _t 03:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC) reply

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it is a good article for the FA. It has all the references.

Thanks, Ineversigninsodonotmessageme ( talk) 02:37, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Ineversigninsodonotmessageme reply

Here are my suggetions to improving the article:

• References are not properly formatted per the MOS. Also all websites need an accessed date listed by them in the references.
• At least one place has a space between the sentence period and the reference
• Several places do not have sufficient inline reference (example: the part about what her parents did has no citation) and there are complete paragraphs without citations
• The article has several citation needed tags that need references
• The comment that Enya is a very private person seems rather subjective and not verifiable.

I don't think this is ready for FA status because a lot of statements need referencing. Biomedeng ( talk) 18:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply