This peer review discussion has been closed.
I have no experience with the FA process, and this is one of the first articles I've written for which enough sourcing exists to get it to FA. I'm wondering, basically, how close the article is currently to being FAC-worthy, and what still needs to happen for it to get there. Of course, comments on other elements of the article are very much welcome.
Sarcasticidealist (
talk)
06:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I have no experience with the FA process, and this is one of the first articles I've written for which enough sourcing exists to get it to FA. I'm wondering, basically, how close the article is currently to being FAC-worthy, and what still needs to happen for it to get there. Of course, comments on other elements of the article are very much welcome.
Sarcasticidealist (
talk)
06:50, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)