I recently created this article, and on the advice of a friend, I have decided to take it to Peer Review with an eye to eventually making it a good article. I'm generally looking for comments about what you think the strengths, and weaknesses of this article are, and what might be some serious stumbling blocks in any good-article nomination. -- Haemo 07:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article. [?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 20:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, well, I struck the length one, since I'm not going for featured article status on this one, but it is as comprehensive as I think is reasonable. I also checked the infoboxes, and it doesn't looks like there are any. I also copyedited it, but could always use more eyes. -- Haemo 00:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Let's see if the Peer Review tool has picked anything else up...
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article. [?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 12:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, it looks like the first APR was pretty accurate. There isn't an infobox, though, AFAIK. -- Haemo 02:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
I recently created this article, and on the advice of a friend, I have decided to take it to Peer Review with an eye to eventually making it a good article. I'm generally looking for comments about what you think the strengths, and weaknesses of this article are, and what might be some serious stumbling blocks in any good-article nomination. -- Haemo 07:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article. [?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 20:48, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, well, I struck the length one, since I'm not going for featured article status on this one, but it is as comprehensive as I think is reasonable. I also checked the infoboxes, and it doesn't looks like there are any. I also copyedited it, but could always use more eyes. -- Haemo 00:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Let's see if the Peer Review tool has picked anything else up...
- The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at WP:LEAD; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article. [?]
There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon. [?]
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. [?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Davnel03 12:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, it looks like the first APR was pretty accurate. There isn't an infobox, though, AFAIK. -- Haemo 02:33, 1 August 2007 (UTC)