I've been working on this article, and I'd like to nominate it for GA sometime. It failed two FA nominations (in 2005 and 2006) and one GA nomination (in 2006). Any suggestions for improvement would be appreciated. --
Jude. 22:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Hi! The article looks nice, and the current structure and sources are useful material if you want to go to GAC. However, the frist objection is that entire sections are blatant copyvios. You can't copy and paste from other websites (or from anywhere); althought you need sources, you have to interpret them in your own words. Then there's the images: While images are good, they might be a little heavy in the article, distracting the reader from the text. Maybe you can try putting a few in the reception section; images in the body of the article should always be informative as to the section they illustrate. Also, as per
WP:MOS, captions are preferred in the form of a sentence, as in "a coffee house in damascus"---->"Coffee houses are a popular meeting place in Damascus".
That's about it. Keep at it, and happy editing!--
SidiLemine 18:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the review! I've cut down on the images, and fixed the captions. Sorry about the copyvios. I didn't copy-and-paste them, but I didn't think to check the information that was already in the article when I started on it. I'll fix that now. Cheers,
Jude. 23:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 1 gallons, use 1 gallons, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 1 gallons.[?]
Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was
Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
Watch for
redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
redundancy exercises.)
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
I've been working on this article, and I'd like to nominate it for GA sometime. It failed two FA nominations (in 2005 and 2006) and one GA nomination (in 2006). Any suggestions for improvement would be appreciated. --
Jude. 22:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Hi! The article looks nice, and the current structure and sources are useful material if you want to go to GAC. However, the frist objection is that entire sections are blatant copyvios. You can't copy and paste from other websites (or from anywhere); althought you need sources, you have to interpret them in your own words. Then there's the images: While images are good, they might be a little heavy in the article, distracting the reader from the text. Maybe you can try putting a few in the reception section; images in the body of the article should always be informative as to the section they illustrate. Also, as per
WP:MOS, captions are preferred in the form of a sentence, as in "a coffee house in damascus"---->"Coffee houses are a popular meeting place in Damascus".
That's about it. Keep at it, and happy editing!--
SidiLemine 18:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the review! I've cut down on the images, and fixed the captions. Sorry about the copyvios. I didn't copy-and-paste them, but I didn't think to check the information that was already in the article when I started on it. I'll fix that now. Cheers,
Jude. 23:19, 25 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic
javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 1 gallons, use 1 gallons, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 1 gallons.[?]
Per
Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was
Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
Watch for
redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's
redundancy exercises.)
Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
As done in
WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the
CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]