This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because Charlie Chaplin is one of the major contributors to the development of the art of screen comedy and also to the art of cinema in general. The previous incarnations of the Chaplin filmography weren't that detailed or well organized. I beleive that my version is an improvement. I've used the filmographies that have attained "Featured List" status as a model for this one. So, give a look, tell me what you think, and perhaps watch a Chaplin film or two in the meantime.
Thanks, Jimknut ( talk) 22:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: A tidy list. Prose needs some attention, though.
Not much else to quibble at. Looks broadly in line with other featured filmogaphies. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the suggestions. If you can give it a second look I'll take any other suggestions into consideration. After that I'll request feature status. BTW, is it okay to strike through your suggestions, or should I have left them the way they are? Jimknut ( talk) 22:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because Charlie Chaplin is one of the major contributors to the development of the art of screen comedy and also to the art of cinema in general. The previous incarnations of the Chaplin filmography weren't that detailed or well organized. I beleive that my version is an improvement. I've used the filmographies that have attained "Featured List" status as a model for this one. So, give a look, tell me what you think, and perhaps watch a Chaplin film or two in the meantime.
Thanks, Jimknut ( talk) 22:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: A tidy list. Prose needs some attention, though.
Not much else to quibble at. Looks broadly in line with other featured filmogaphies. Brianboulton ( talk) 18:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the suggestions. If you can give it a second look I'll take any other suggestions into consideration. After that I'll request feature status. BTW, is it okay to strike through your suggestions, or should I have left them the way they are? Jimknut ( talk) 22:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)