This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because
User:Aboutmovies and I would like to take it to FAC, and we would appreciate advice from as many editors as possible before doing that.
Thanks, Finetooth ( talk) 22:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Doing...—
S Marshall
Talk/
Cont
11:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Aside from that, I haven't found anything else to criticise about it; so I don't have much else to add on second reading. It's a decent, thorough article and on simplifying and freshening up the English a bit, I think it'll be fit to stand alongside Wikipedia's best work.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 15:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because
User:Aboutmovies and I would like to take it to FAC, and we would appreciate advice from as many editors as possible before doing that.
Thanks, Finetooth ( talk) 22:40, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Doing...—
S Marshall
Talk/
Cont
11:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Aside from that, I haven't found anything else to criticise about it; so I don't have much else to add on second reading. It's a decent, thorough article and on simplifying and freshening up the English a bit, I think it'll be fit to stand alongside Wikipedia's best work.— S Marshall Talk/ Cont 15:58, 9 August 2009 (UTC)