This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it is a very interesting article. The important fact all appear to be well referenced. The subject is quite interesting because it has some good links to other articles such as
radioactive contamination. Finally, the footnotes and references appear well located. I would like to see this as a featured article.
Thanks, CyclePat ( talk) 21:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments ErikvDijk
ErikvDijk ( talk) 19:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: This is an interesting article about an isotope that most people have heard of but probably do not understand and could not explain. It would be great to have an encyclopedia article that explained it so clearly that most readers would comprehend the basics. Here are a few suggestions of a general-reader sort. You might seek further comments from specific editors listed in the natural sciences subsection of WP:PRV.
I hope you find these comments helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog. That is where I found this one. Finetooth ( talk) 19:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it is a very interesting article. The important fact all appear to be well referenced. The subject is quite interesting because it has some good links to other articles such as
radioactive contamination. Finally, the footnotes and references appear well located. I would like to see this as a featured article.
Thanks, CyclePat ( talk) 21:58, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments ErikvDijk
ErikvDijk ( talk) 19:06, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Finetooth comments: This is an interesting article about an isotope that most people have heard of but probably do not understand and could not explain. It would be great to have an encyclopedia article that explained it so clearly that most readers would comprehend the basics. Here are a few suggestions of a general-reader sort. You might seek further comments from specific editors listed in the natural sciences subsection of WP:PRV.
I hope you find these comments helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog. That is where I found this one. Finetooth ( talk) 19:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments