Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want feedback on my article, and a good assessment of the quality/importance for the Africa Project
Thanks, Powerkeys
Powerkeys (
talk) 21:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Powerkeys. First, quality/importance are rated by individual projects, not by the peer review process. I would suggest posting on the WikiProject Africa discussion page (or on a designated assessment page if there is one) in order to get an assessment completed. Second, although I'm not really sure where you want to take the article (i.e. simple improvement, GA, FA, etc), I have quite a few suggestions. It looks like a nice start, but there is a lot of work that is needed for, for example, GA status. Here are my suggestions:
I hope these suggestions help. I am watchlisting this page, so please feel free to post here with any questions you may have about my above comments. Dana boomer ( talk) 00:27, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want feedback on my article, and a good assessment of the quality/importance for the Africa Project
Thanks, Powerkeys
Powerkeys (
talk) 21:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Powerkeys. First, quality/importance are rated by individual projects, not by the peer review process. I would suggest posting on the WikiProject Africa discussion page (or on a designated assessment page if there is one) in order to get an assessment completed. Second, although I'm not really sure where you want to take the article (i.e. simple improvement, GA, FA, etc), I have quite a few suggestions. It looks like a nice start, but there is a lot of work that is needed for, for example, GA status. Here are my suggestions:
I hope these suggestions help. I am watchlisting this page, so please feel free to post here with any questions you may have about my above comments. Dana boomer ( talk) 00:27, 18 December 2009 (UTC)