Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
It was flagged as being an advert, I have removed many of the additions that are actually not part of CADSTAR itself but are additional programs that can interact with CADSTAR.
I have also tried to remove much of the sales speak to make it more understandable for the average reader.
I have also removed additional links that are unnecessary as they can be found from the one remaining link.
If there is still something wrong with the article please explain what it is and what I should do to correct it (rather than just change it - I will not learn otherwise).
If more could be said about the software, please explain/provide a link to an article that may give me more ideas on what to/how to say.
Thanks,
Cadstar_User (
talk)
22:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: This is so short there is not a lot to say, still here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
I am no expert at wiki editing so I cannot change the links to anything else, neither can I find any links that do not have COI or are simple adverts or from the software makers own website (I have gone through 30+ google pages). However Autocad seems to have plenty of those links - how come that page is OK?
The lack of references is because the only web pages on the internet that reference CADSTAR are those that are trying to sell or advertise it - an obvious COI. Why should that result in the articles deletion? just because it is little talked about?
Re the modules section being uncited - what on earth is that? the software has lots of modules in it, they are listed in the module section.
A lead - its not a dog - what are you on about?
You ask for an image but then say not to breach copyright - no images for CADSTAR exist that are not copyright to Zuken so no I cannot provide any images unless you can tell me otherwise.
The pages linked to are confusing to a noob at wiki editing, examples would be better.
Cheers. Cadstar_User ( talk) 21:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
It was flagged as being an advert, I have removed many of the additions that are actually not part of CADSTAR itself but are additional programs that can interact with CADSTAR.
I have also tried to remove much of the sales speak to make it more understandable for the average reader.
I have also removed additional links that are unnecessary as they can be found from the one remaining link.
If there is still something wrong with the article please explain what it is and what I should do to correct it (rather than just change it - I will not learn otherwise).
If more could be said about the software, please explain/provide a link to an article that may give me more ideas on what to/how to say.
Thanks,
Cadstar_User (
talk)
22:58, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: This is so short there is not a lot to say, still here are some suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
I am no expert at wiki editing so I cannot change the links to anything else, neither can I find any links that do not have COI or are simple adverts or from the software makers own website (I have gone through 30+ google pages). However Autocad seems to have plenty of those links - how come that page is OK?
The lack of references is because the only web pages on the internet that reference CADSTAR are those that are trying to sell or advertise it - an obvious COI. Why should that result in the articles deletion? just because it is little talked about?
Re the modules section being uncited - what on earth is that? the software has lots of modules in it, they are listed in the module section.
A lead - its not a dog - what are you on about?
You ask for an image but then say not to breach copyright - no images for CADSTAR exist that are not copyright to Zuken so no I cannot provide any images unless you can tell me otherwise.
The pages linked to are confusing to a noob at wiki editing, examples would be better.
Cheers. Cadstar_User ( talk) 21:15, 3 May 2012 (UTC)