Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… there currently aren't any featured articles about a football season and I think that with a bit of work this could be the first. I'd appreciate if someone could check through the prose to find any errors or omissions that were missed in the GA review. From my previous experiences at FAC, I think the main problem will be with the sources, as most of the article has been written from one book. (EDIT: just to clarify, the book is self-published and this is the issue. I have replaced some of the citations from the book with references to articles from
The Times to try and rectify this in part) However, there isn't alternative literature containing a season-by-season history of Burnley F.C. so I wonder if anybody has ideas for what I can do about this. Thanks in advance for having a look at the article.
Cheers, Big Dom 08:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments:
There may be problem confirming the US PD status of the images, unless further information can be gathered:-
These are issues that have to faced if the article is to come to FAC. I will try to find time during the next few days to look at the prose and say some positive things. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Just one comment: the tables for results are inconsistent between the League and other matches. In the League section you have included the football symbol ( 6') to illustrate the goals scored, but not in the Other matches section. Personally, I'd rather they were not there at all - they are fine in a match summary, but look out of place here. Otherwise, great stuff. I'm starting to create season articles for
Southampton, starting with
1894–95; if you have any comments, can you let me know. Cheers.
Daemonic Kangaroo (
talk) 11:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… there currently aren't any featured articles about a football season and I think that with a bit of work this could be the first. I'd appreciate if someone could check through the prose to find any errors or omissions that were missed in the GA review. From my previous experiences at FAC, I think the main problem will be with the sources, as most of the article has been written from one book. (EDIT: just to clarify, the book is self-published and this is the issue. I have replaced some of the citations from the book with references to articles from
The Times to try and rectify this in part) However, there isn't alternative literature containing a season-by-season history of Burnley F.C. so I wonder if anybody has ideas for what I can do about this. Thanks in advance for having a look at the article.
Cheers, Big Dom 08:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments:
There may be problem confirming the US PD status of the images, unless further information can be gathered:-
These are issues that have to faced if the article is to come to FAC. I will try to find time during the next few days to look at the prose and say some positive things. Brianboulton ( talk) 23:10, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Just one comment: the tables for results are inconsistent between the League and other matches. In the League section you have included the football symbol ( 6') to illustrate the goals scored, but not in the Other matches section. Personally, I'd rather they were not there at all - they are fine in a match summary, but look out of place here. Otherwise, great stuff. I'm starting to create season articles for
Southampton, starting with
1894–95; if you have any comments, can you let me know. Cheers.
Daemonic Kangaroo (
talk) 11:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)