This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get this to GA, or failing that, at least improve it. I know that it lacks refs, but want to identify its other weaknesses. I will work on the lead, refs and general style of the article.
Thanks, Queenie 14:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments
The subject is interesting and of significance, and the article is definitely worth working on. Brianboulton ( talk) 11:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get this to GA, or failing that, at least improve it. I know that it lacks refs, but want to identify its other weaknesses. I will work on the lead, refs and general style of the article.
Thanks, Queenie 14:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments
The subject is interesting and of significance, and the article is definitely worth working on. Brianboulton ( talk) 11:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)