Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This album happens to be one of my favorites at the moment, and I would like to see this article become a GA article and eventually an FA article. I have recently put some work into the article for a few days, but I'm sure that the article still needs some improvements. A number of users have also given contributions to the article, including
User:Theologiae,
User:Legolas2186, and
User:Dan56. Like I said, I'm sure the article still needs some improvements, and some feedback would be much appreciated so that I can make those improvements.
Thanks in advanced, DAP388 ( talk) 17:00, 22 July 2011
|publisher=MTV|publisher=[[Viacom]]
I suggest you put
Viacom in parentheses after MTV
like this: |publisher=MTV ([[Viacom]])
.publisher=Rolling Stone
to work=Rolling Stone
. That will also be the answer to why Rolling Stone isn't even showing up.[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]''|publisher=...
. Everything is turning out in italics.Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This album happens to be one of my favorites at the moment, and I would like to see this article become a GA article and eventually an FA article. I have recently put some work into the article for a few days, but I'm sure that the article still needs some improvements. A number of users have also given contributions to the article, including
User:Theologiae,
User:Legolas2186, and
User:Dan56. Like I said, I'm sure the article still needs some improvements, and some feedback would be much appreciated so that I can make those improvements.
Thanks in advanced, DAP388 ( talk) 17:00, 22 July 2011
|publisher=MTV|publisher=[[Viacom]]
I suggest you put
Viacom in parentheses after MTV
like this: |publisher=MTV ([[Viacom]])
.publisher=Rolling Stone
to work=Rolling Stone
. That will also be the answer to why Rolling Stone isn't even showing up.[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]''|publisher=...
. Everything is turning out in italics.