Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've done a fair amount of work on it and would like an external opinion.
Thanks, Farrtj ( talk) 19:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: Could you be a little more specific about the purpose of this review. You say you would "like an external opinion" – with what in mind? Are you, for example, thinking of a future nomination at GAN, or FAC? For the present I can offer a few general suggestions as to how the article might be improved, whatever your future intentions may be:-
Attention to these points would be a good starting point for improving the article. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've done a fair amount of work on it and would like an external opinion.
Thanks, Farrtj ( talk) 19:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: Could you be a little more specific about the purpose of this review. You say you would "like an external opinion" – with what in mind? Are you, for example, thinking of a future nomination at GAN, or FAC? For the present I can offer a few general suggestions as to how the article might be improved, whatever your future intentions may be:-
Attention to these points would be a good starting point for improving the article. Brianboulton ( talk) 21:57, 12 May 2011 (UTC)