Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i want to take it to FAC someday. I am conscious that how it stands right now, it definitely has several issues and this is the reason for which i have nominated it for a peer review. I want someone who will help me bring the prose of this article to FA standard. I hope i am not asking for too much. Regards.
Jivesh 1205 (
talk /
Make sure you give 4 a try!!!)
05:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Jivesh 1205 ( talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 05:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Peer review is not really the place to fine copy editors - I would ask at WP:GOCE Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Finetooth comments I agree with Ruhrfisch that WP:GOCE would be the place to seek copyediting help. That said, the prose in the existing article is reasonably good though not quite good enough for GA. It would not take a good copyeditor long to bring the prose to GA standards and not much longer to improve it to FA standards, in my opinion. The article looks comprehensive to me, though I am not a content expert in this area. I see no obvious problems with the images except for File:J.Que.jpg, which has serious licensing problems, and File:Vanessa Carlton promo photo (recoloured).jpg, which has incomplete data in its license. Ron Shapiro Management might be able to supply the missing information about the author and date of creation for the Carlton image.
Lead
Critical reception
I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider commenting on any other article at WP:PR. I don't usually watch the PR archives or make follow-up comments. If my suggestions are unclear, please ping me on my talk page. Finetooth ( talk) 18:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i want to take it to FAC someday. I am conscious that how it stands right now, it definitely has several issues and this is the reason for which i have nominated it for a peer review. I want someone who will help me bring the prose of this article to FA standard. I hope i am not asking for too much. Regards.
Jivesh 1205 (
talk /
Make sure you give 4 a try!!!)
05:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Jivesh 1205 ( talk / Make sure you give 4 a try!!!) 05:10, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Peer review is not really the place to fine copy editors - I would ask at WP:GOCE Ruhrfisch ><>°° 13:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Finetooth comments I agree with Ruhrfisch that WP:GOCE would be the place to seek copyediting help. That said, the prose in the existing article is reasonably good though not quite good enough for GA. It would not take a good copyeditor long to bring the prose to GA standards and not much longer to improve it to FA standards, in my opinion. The article looks comprehensive to me, though I am not a content expert in this area. I see no obvious problems with the images except for File:J.Que.jpg, which has serious licensing problems, and File:Vanessa Carlton promo photo (recoloured).jpg, which has incomplete data in its license. Ron Shapiro Management might be able to supply the missing information about the author and date of creation for the Carlton image.
Lead
Critical reception
I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider commenting on any other article at WP:PR. I don't usually watch the PR archives or make follow-up comments. If my suggestions are unclear, please ping me on my talk page. Finetooth ( talk) 18:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)