Beckton Gas Works

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

• A script has been used to generate a semi- automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR  _t 02:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… the article has gone through substantial development by a relatively new editor, and he needs to be given some indication of how his work fits into the wikipedia quality process.

Thanks, Kbthompson ( talk) 00:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply

The principal editor would benefit from feedback on:

• Manual of style issues
• Comprehensiveness and relevance - what do people want to see from an article of this type
• A plan to move the article forward to Good Article status

Thanks Kbthompson ( talk) 09:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Comments from MeegsC: A few notes to start, with more to come...

• The lead is far too short. It should summarize the basic points of the article.
• Eliminate as many 1-2 sentence paragraphs as possible. Can they be expanded, or combined with other paragraph?
• Popular culture sections are generally discouraged, but at a minimum, you should convert the list of bullet points into proper paragraphs. And all the items in this section would need in-line referencing.
• The assertion that the "Beckton Alps" is the highest artificial hill in London needs a reference.

MeegsC | Talk 11:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for that, very useful comments. I'll drawer the editor's attention to the review. cheers Kbthompson ( talk) 11:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC) reply