McClintock was one of the big names of 20th century genetics. Does this article read-through ok for non-scientists? Is there anything that is missing or could be expanded upon?-- nixie 01:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks Mike, I have access to that journal though uni, jugding by the size of it- it should be very useful for expanding or creating a section on how her ideas were recieved. -- nixie 00:00, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Structure wise has a few short paragraphs and one or two one-sentence paragraphs. And "Early Life" is a little short... Ryan Norton T | @ | C 21:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
As of 06/03/06, I think the amount of early life detail is fine. Could do with a 'private life' section detailing relationships, marriage(s), children etc or at least a statement if none of these apply.-- ChrisJMoor 01:26, March 6, 2006 (UTC)
McClintock was one of the big names of 20th century genetics. Does this article read-through ok for non-scientists? Is there anything that is missing or could be expanded upon?-- nixie 01:01, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks Mike, I have access to that journal though uni, jugding by the size of it- it should be very useful for expanding or creating a section on how her ideas were recieved. -- nixie 00:00, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Structure wise has a few short paragraphs and one or two one-sentence paragraphs. And "Early Life" is a little short... Ryan Norton T | @ | C 21:33, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
As of 06/03/06, I think the amount of early life detail is fine. Could do with a 'private life' section detailing relationships, marriage(s), children etc or at least a statement if none of these apply.-- ChrisJMoor 01:26, March 6, 2006 (UTC)